ATI Radeon 9600 vs R9 390X

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390X and Radeon 9600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 390X
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
21.03
+26188%

R9 390X outperforms ATI 9600 by a whopping 26188% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2431472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.72no data
Power efficiency6.080.53
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGrenadaRV350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speedno data324 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate184.81.296
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1764

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB64 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz189 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s6.048 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 390X 21.03
+26188%
ATI 9600 0.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390X 9396
+26746%
ATI 9600 35

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91-0−1
4K48-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.71no data
4K8.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65 0−1
Battlefield 5 90−95 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 0−1
Far Cry 5 75−80 0−1
Fortnite 110−120 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 0−1
Valorant 160−170 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65 0−1
Battlefield 5 90−95 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 0−1
Dota 2 110−120 0−1
Far Cry 5 75−80 0−1
Fortnite 110−120 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85 0−1
Metro Exodus 50−55 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76 0−1
Valorant 160−170 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 0−1
Dota 2 110−120 0−1
Far Cry 5 75−80 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41 0−1
Valorant 160−170 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 0−1
Metro Exodus 30−33 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 190−200 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 0−1
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 0−1
Valorant 130−140 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 75−80 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.03 0.08
Recency 18 June 2015 1 October 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 12 Watt

R9 390X has a 26187.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600, on the other hand, has 2191.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 390X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
ATI Radeon 9600
Radeon 9600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 270 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 140 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390X or Radeon 9600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.