GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon R9 390X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390X and GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 390X
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
24.47

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms R9 390X by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking229203
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.1376.13
Power efficiency6.1427.33
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGrenadaGA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 $179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3050 6 GB has 652% better value for money than R9 390X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28162304
Core clock speedno data1042 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate184.8105.8
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPS6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs17672
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length275 mm242 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB6 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390X 24.47
RTX 3050 6 GB 27.73
+13.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390X 9408
RTX 3050 6 GB 10663
+13.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
−11.1%
100−110
+11.1%
4K51
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.77
−166%
1.79
+166%
4K8.41
−158%
3.25
+158%
  • RTX 3050 6 GB has 166% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6 GB has 158% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Elden Ring 80−85
−12.5%
90−95
+12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−6.7%
80−85
+6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−12.1%
120−130
+12.1%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−11.1%
60−65
+11.1%
Valorant 95−100
−12.2%
110−120
+12.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−6.7%
80−85
+6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Dota 2 80−85
−13.1%
95−100
+13.1%
Elden Ring 80−85
−12.5%
90−95
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−11.8%
85−90
+11.8%
Fortnite 120−130
−5.7%
130−140
+5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−12.1%
120−130
+12.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
−13.1%
95−100
+13.1%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−9.7%
170−180
+9.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−11.1%
60−65
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78
−9%
85−90
+9%
Valorant 95−100
−12.2%
110−120
+12.2%
World of Tanks 250−260
−13.3%
290−300
+13.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−6.7%
80−85
+6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Dota 2 80−85
−13.1%
95−100
+13.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−11.8%
85−90
+11.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−12.1%
120−130
+12.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−9.7%
170−180
+9.7%
Valorant 95−100
−12.2%
110−120
+12.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Elden Ring 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−8.6%
190−200
+8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
World of Tanks 160−170
−11.1%
180−190
+11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−12.7%
80−85
+12.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−7.1%
60−65
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Valorant 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Dota 2 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Elden Ring 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−6.7%
80−85
+6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Dota 2 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Valorant 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%

This is how R9 390X and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 11% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.47 27.73
Recency 18 June 2015 2 February 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 3050 6 GB has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 292.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 390X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 264 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1410 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.