Radeon R9 M380 vs R9 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390 with Radeon R9 M380, including specs and performance data.

R9 390
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
23.09
+223%

R9 390 outperforms R9 M380 by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking223514
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.47no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameGrenadaStrato Pro GDDR5
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)16 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data
Current price$20 (0.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Wattno data
Texture fill rate160.048.00
Floating-point performance5,120 gflops1,536 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 390 and Radeon R9 M380 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity11
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration--
CrossFire1no data
Enduro--
FreeSync11
HD3D-+
PowerTune++
DualGraphicsno data1
TrueAudio++
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphicsno data1
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.36.3
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.0Not Listed
Vulkan+no data
Mantle++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390 23.09
+223%
R9 M380 7.15

R9 390 outperforms R9 M380 by 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 390 8915
+223%
R9 M380 2762

R9 390 outperforms R9 M380 by 223% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+200%
20−22
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+214%
35−40
−214%
Hitman 3 40−45
+208%
12−14
−208%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+203%
30−35
−203%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+216%
18−20
−216%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+200%
20−22
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+204%
21−24
−204%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+200%
20−22
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+214%
35−40
−214%
Hitman 3 40−45
+208%
12−14
−208%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+203%
30−35
−203%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+216%
18−20
−216%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+200%
20−22
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+204%
21−24
−204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+214%
35−40
−214%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+203%
30−35
−203%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+204%
21−24
−204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+200%
20−22
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+221%
14−16
−221%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+208%
12−14
−208%
Hitman 3 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Hitman 3 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.09 7.15

The Radeon R9 390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 is a desktop card while Radeon R9 M380 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 538 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.