Quadro T600 Mobile vs Radeon R9 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390 with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 390
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
23.09
+40.1%

R9 390 outperforms T600 Mobile by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking223307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.47no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGrenadaTU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data
Current price$20 (0.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560896
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate160.074.76
Floating-point performance5,120 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 390 and Quadro T600 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.2
Mantle+no data
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390 23.09
+40.1%
T600 Mobile 16.48

Radeon R9 390 outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 390 12730
+60.6%
T600 Mobile 7928

Radeon R9 390 outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 61% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
+37.3%
51
−37.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 53
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+54%
50−55
−54%
Hitman 3 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 49
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+54%
50−55
−54%
Hitman 3 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+54%
50−55
−54%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

This is how R9 390 and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • R9 390 is 37% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.09 16.48
Recency 18 June 2015 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 40 Watt

The Radeon R9 390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T600 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 is a desktop card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 538 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.