ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830 vs R9 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390 with Mobility Radeon HD 5830, including specs and performance data.

R9 390
2015, $329
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
21.07
+1613%

R9 390 outperforms Mobility HD 5830 by a whopping 1613% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 390 R9 390
ATI Mobility HD 5830 Mobility HD 5830

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3041094
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.12no data
Power efficiency5.903.95
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGrenadaBroadway
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)7 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560800
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt24 Watt
Texture fill rate160.020.00
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16040
L1 Cache640 KB80 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB1 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.07 1.23
Recency 18 June 2015 7 January 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 24 Watt

R9 390 has a 1613% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 5830, on the other hand, has 1046% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5830 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5830 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 390 Radeon R9 390
vs
R9 295X2 Radeon R9 295X2
ATI Mobility HD 5830 Mobility Radeon HD 5830
vs
HD 6730M Radeon HD 6730M
R9 390 Radeon R9 390
vs
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
R7 360 896SP AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
vs
i815 Graphics i815 Graphics
R7 360 896SP AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
vs
RX Vega 9 RX Vega 9
R7 360 896SP AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
vs
GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-2
R7 360 896SP AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
vs
RX 8050S RX 8050S
R9 390 AMD Radeon R9 390
vs
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
R9 390 AMD Radeon R9 390
vs
ATI Mobility X1900 Radeon X1900
R9 390 AMD Radeon R9 390
vs
9200M GS GeForce 9200M GS
R9 390 AMD Radeon R9 390
vs
HD 6625M HD 6625M
R9 390 AMD Radeon R9 390
vs
GT 745A GT 745A
R9 390 AMD Radeon R9 390
vs
GTX 465 GTX 465

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 668 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 or Mobility Radeon HD 5830, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.