GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs Radeon R9 390

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390 with GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

R9 390
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
23.09

RTX 2070 Max-Q outperforms R9 390 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking238181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.63no data
Power efficiency5.8126.17
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGrenadaTU106B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602304
Core clock speedno data885 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1185 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0170.6
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS5.46 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390 23.09
RTX 2070 Max-Q 30.23
+30.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390 8909
RTX 2070 Max-Q 11665
+30.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 390 12730
RTX 2070 Max-Q 17335
+36.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−37.1%
96
+37.1%
1440p40−45
−40%
56
+40%
4K30−35
−33.3%
40
+33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.70no data
1440p8.23no data
4K10.97no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 71
+0%
71
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
+0%
73
+0%
Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 113
+0%
113
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 204
+0%
204
+0%
Hitman 3 81
+0%
81
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 148
+0%
148
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 118
+0%
118
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
+0%
61
+0%
Battlefield 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 74
+0%
74
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+0%
77
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 191
+0%
191
+0%
Hitman 3 81
+0%
81
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 120
+0%
120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
+0%
50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 54
+0%
54
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 57
+0%
57
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
Hitman 3 72
+0%
72
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 105
+0%
105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
+0%
51
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+0%
84
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50
+0%
50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
+0%
33
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 176
+0%
176
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80
+0%
80
+0%
Metro Exodus 72
+0%
72
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
+0%
28
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+0%
20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how R9 390 and RTX 2070 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 37% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 40% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 33% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.09 30.23
Recency 18 June 2015 29 January 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 2070 Max-Q has a 30.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 243.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 390 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 563 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 344 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.