To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
AMD Radeon R9 390 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 0
- Max video memory 0
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 1000
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
|Place in performance rating||158||143|
|Value for money||29.58||41.45|
|Architecture||GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)||Pascal (2016−2021)|
|GPU code name||Grenada||GP106|
|Release date||18 June 2015 (7 years ago)||18 August 2016 (5 years ago)|
|Launch price (MSRP)||$329||$199|
|Price now||$278 (0.8x MSRP)||$272 (1.4x MSRP)|
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
|Pipelines / CUDA cores||2560||no data|
|Boost clock speed||1000 MHz||no data|
|Number of transistors||6,200 million||4,400 million|
|Manufacturing process technology||28 nm||16 nm|
|Thermal design power (TDP)||275 Watt||no data|
|Texture fill rate||160.0||123.0|
|Floating-point performance||5,120 gflops||3,935 gflops|
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
|Bus support||PCIe 3.0||no data|
|Interface||PCIe 3.0 x16||PCIe 3.0 x16|
|Length||275 mm||250 mm|
|Supplementary power connectors||1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin||no data|
|Bridgeless CrossFire||1||no data|
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
|Memory type||GDDR5||no data|
|High bandwidth memory (HBM)||-||no data|
|Maximum RAM amount||0 MB||no data|
|Memory bus width||512 Bit||no data|
|Memory clock speed||1000 MHz||no data|
|Memory bandwidth||384 GB/s||no data|
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
|Display Connectors||2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort||no data|
|Number of Eyefinity displays||6||no data|
|DisplayPort support||+||no data|
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
|DDMA audio||+||no data|
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
|DirectX||DirectX® 12||no data|
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R9 390 and GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
|Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)||593 Mh/s||no data|
|Decred / DCR (Decred)||0.95 Gh/s||no data|
|Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)||29.26 Mh/s||19 Mh/s|
|Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)||0.81 kh/s||no data|
|Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)||380.03 Sol/s||no data|
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
|Novelty||18 June 2015||18 August 2016|
|Chip lithography||28 nm||16 nm|
Technical City couldn't decide between
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Radeon R9 390 by NVIDIA
The nearest Radeon R9 390's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK, which is faster by 1% and higher by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R9 390:
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB from AMD is Radeon R9 Fury, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.