GeForce 8800 GS vs Radeon R9 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390 and GeForce 8800 GS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 390
2015, $329
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
21.16
+2578%

R9 390 outperforms 8800 GS by a whopping 2578% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2961202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.20no data
Power efficiency5.910.58
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGrenadaG92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)31 January 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256096
Core clock speedno data550 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt105 Watt
Texture fill rate160.026.40
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS0.264 TFLOPS
ROPs6412
TMUs16048
L1 Cache640 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB48 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length275 mm229 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin1x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB384 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s38.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 390 21.16
+2578%
8800 GS 0.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390 8848
+2581%
Samples: 3340
8800 GS 330
Samples: 108

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.16 0.79
Recency 18 June 2015 31 January 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 105 Watt

R9 390 has a 2578.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

8800 GS, on the other hand, has 161.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 390 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 645 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 or GeForce 8800 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.