ATI FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390 with FirePro V5800, including specs and performance data.

R9 390
2015, $329
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
21.07
+523%

R9 390 outperforms V5800 by a whopping 523% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking304789
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.120.18
Power efficiency5.903.52
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGrenadaJuniper
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)26 April 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 $479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

R9 390 has 5522% better value for money than ATI V5800.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560800
Core clock speedno data690 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt74 Watt
Texture fill rate160.027.60
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS1.104 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16040
L1 Cache640 KB80 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length275 mm229 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB1 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 390 21.07
+523%
ATI V5800 3.38

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390 8804
+522%
Samples: 3399
ATI V5800 1415

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.07 3.38
Recency 18 June 2015 26 April 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 74 Watt

R9 390 has a 523% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

ATI V5800, on the other hand, has 272% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 390 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V5800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 674 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 97 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 or FirePro V5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.