Arc B370 vs Radeon R9 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390 with Arc B370, including specs and performance data.

R9 390
2015, $329
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
21.32
+8.6%

R9 390 outperforms B370 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking305318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.27no data
Power efficiency5.90no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameGrenadaPanther Lake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (11 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601280
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate160.096.00
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs16040
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cache640 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth384 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.4
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 390 21.32
+8.6%
Arc B370 19.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390 8801
+8.6%
Samples: 3401
Arc B370 8105
Samples: 19

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.32 19.63
Recency 18 June 2015 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 25 Watt

R9 390 has a 9% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc B370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 833% more advanced lithography process, and 1000% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 390 and Arc B370.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 is a desktop graphics card while Arc B370 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 676 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 6 votes

Rate Arc B370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 or Arc B370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.