FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R9 390 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.58
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGrenadaHawaii
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2015 (10 years ago)23 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560 ×22560
Core clock speed1000 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0 ×2131.8
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS ×24.219 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×264
TMUs160 ×2160
L1 Cache640 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×28 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2512 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×2320 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI+-
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 23 June 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 220 Watt

R9 390 X2 has an age advantage of 1 year.

FirePro W8100, on the other hand, has 163.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and FirePro W8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 X2 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro W8100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2
AMD FirePro W8100
FirePro W8100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 39 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 21 votes

Rate FirePro W8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 X2 or FirePro W8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.