ATI Radeon X800 GT vs R9 380X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 380X and Radeon X800 GT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 380X
2015, $229
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
14.66
+7230%

R9 380X outperforms X800 by a whopping 7230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3971456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.03no data
Power efficiency5.940.39
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameAntiguaR480
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 November 2015 (10 years ago)1 November 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Compute units32no data
Core clock speedno data475 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate124.25.700
Floating-point processing power3.973 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3212
TMUs12812
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors​2 x 6-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz493 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s31.55 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 380X 14.66
+7230%
ATI X800 GT 0.20

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 380X 6127
+7194%
Samples: 1195
ATI X800 GT 84
Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.66 0.20
Recency 19 November 2015 1 November 2005
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 40 Watt

R9 380X has a 7230% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X800 GT, on the other hand, has 375% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 380X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 GT in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 220 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380X or Radeon X800 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.