Quadro K600 vs Radeon R9 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K120Q K140Q K160Q K180Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 380 with Quadro K600, including specs and performance data.

R9 380
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
13.61
+730%

R9 380 outperforms K600 by a whopping 730% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 380 R9 380
Quadro K600 Quadro K600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking389964
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.410.11
Power efficiency5.773.22
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameAntiguaGK107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)1 March 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

R9 380 has 6636% better value for money than Quadro K600.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792192
Compute units28no data
Core clock speedno data876 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt41 Watt
Texture fill rate108.614.02
Floating-point processing power3.476 TFLOPS0.3364 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs11216
L1 Cache448 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length221 mm160 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full length / dual slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan++
Mantle+-
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 380 13.61
+730%
Quadro K600 1.64

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 380 6020
+733%
Samples: 3838
Quadro K600 723
Samples: 1192

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65
+829%
7−8
−829%
4K25
+733%
3−4
−733%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06
+829%
28.43
−829%
4K7.96
+733%
66.33
−733%
  • R9 380 has 829% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R9 380 has 733% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+811%
9−10
−811%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 60−65
+800%
7−8
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+811%
9−10
−811%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Fortnite 80−85
+730%
10−11
−730%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+771%
7−8
−771%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
Valorant 120−130
+764%
14−16
−764%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 60−65
+800%
7−8
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+811%
9−10
−811%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+833%
21−24
−833%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Dota 2 90−95
+830%
10−11
−830%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Fortnite 80−85
+730%
10−11
−730%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+771%
7−8
−771%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+750%
6−7
−750%
Valorant 120−130
+764%
14−16
−764%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+800%
7−8
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Dota 2 90−95
+830%
10−11
−830%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+771%
7−8
−771%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+900%
3−4
−900%
Valorant 120−130
+764%
14−16
−764%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+730%
10−11
−730%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+808%
12−14
−808%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+788%
16−18
−788%
Valorant 140−150
+831%
16−18
−831%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+850%
2−3
−850%
Valorant 80−85
+789%
9−10
−789%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 50−55
+767%
6−7
−767%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

This is how R9 380 and Quadro K600 compete in popular games:

  • R9 380 is 829% faster in 1080p
  • R9 380 is 733% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.61 1.64
Recency 18 June 2015 1 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 41 Watt

R9 380 has a 729.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro K600, on the other hand, has 363.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 380 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
NVIDIA Quadro K600
Quadro K600
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
GRID K140Q GRID K140Q
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
GTX 960 GeForce GTX 960
GTX 1080 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
vs
Arc 3 A370M 3 A370M
GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
vs
GT 1030 GK107 GT 1030 GK107
GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
vs
Apple M4 32-core GPU 32 core GPU
RX 470 AMD Radeon RX 470
vs
HD 7470M HD 7470M
R9 280X AMD Radeon R9 280X
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
R9 380 AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
NVS 280 PCIe NVS 280 PCIe
R9 380 AMD Radeon R9 380
vs
UHD Graphics 600 Graphics 600
GTX 960 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
vs
ATI HD 5450 PCIe x1 HD 5450 PCIe x1
GTX 680 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
vs
HD 8280 HD 8280
GTX 680 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
vs
HD 6750 HD 6750

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 877 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 212 votes

Rate Quadro K600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380 or Quadro K600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.