GeForce 7100 GS vs Radeon R9 380

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 380 and GeForce 7100 GS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 380
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
14.65
+12108%

R9 380 outperforms 7100 GS by a whopping 12108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3591449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.48no data
Power efficiency5.65no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameAntiguaNV44 B2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)8 August 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Compute units28no data
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Wattno data
Texture fill rate108.61.400
Floating-point processing power3.476 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full length / dual slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz266 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s4.256 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.33.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 380 14.65
+12108%
7100 GS 0.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 380 6084
+11829%
7100 GS 51

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD650−1
4K25-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06no data
4K7.96no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Fortnite 80−85 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+19700%
1−2
−19700%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Dota 2 90−95 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Fortnite 80−85 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Dota 2 90−95 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 0−1
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+14200%
1−2
−14200%
Valorant 150−160
+15100%
1−2
−15100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19 0−1
Valorant 80−85 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 50−55 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.65 0.12
Recency 18 June 2015 8 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

R9 380 has a 12108.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 380 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7100 GS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
NVIDIA GeForce 7100 GS
GeForce 7100 GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 851 vote

Rate Radeon R9 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 45 votes

Rate GeForce 7100 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380 or GeForce 7100 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.