Tesla P4 vs Radeon R9 370

Place in the ranking	456	293
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	7.88	22.02
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Trinidad	GP104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	5 May 2015 (10 years ago)	13 September 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	2560
Core clock speed	925 MHz	886 MHz
Boost clock speed	975 MHz	1114 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	78.00	178.2
Floating-point processing power	2.496 TFLOPS	5.704 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	80	160
L1 Cache	384 KB	960 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	221 mm	168 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	192.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 370 11.24

Tesla P4 21.43
+90.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 370 4722
Samples: 3

Tesla P4 9004
+90.7%

Samples: 50

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−88.9%

85−90
+88.9%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.24	21.43
Recency	5 May 2015	13 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	75 Watt

Tesla P4 has a 90.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 46.7% lower power consumption.

The Tesla P4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 370 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla P4 is a workstation one.