GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon R9 370

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 370 and GeForce GT 220, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 370
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 110 Watt
12.23
+2084%

R9 370 outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 2084% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking3741175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameTrinidadGT216
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)12 October 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79.99
Current price$325 $121 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 370 and GT 220 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128048
CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed925 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt58 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate78.009.840
Floating-point performance2,496 gflops144 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length221 mm6.6" (16.8 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5600 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s25.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortVGADVIHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 370 12.23
+2084%
GT 220 0.56

Radeon R9 370 outperforms GeForce GT 220 by 2084% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 370 4722
+2076%
GT 220 217

Radeon R9 370 outperforms GeForce GT 220 by 2076% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
+114%
21
−114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Hitman 3 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+2067%
12−14
−2067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+2043%
7−8
−2043%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+2011%
9−10
−2011%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Hitman 3 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+2067%
12−14
−2067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+2043%
7−8
−2043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+2011%
9−10
−2011%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+2067%
12−14
−2067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+2043%
7−8
−2043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+2011%
9−10
−2011%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2025%
4−5
−2025%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Hitman 3 130−140
+2067%
6−7
−2067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+2025%
4−5
−2025%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%

This is how R9 370 and GT 220 compete in popular games:

  • R9 370 is 114% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.23 0.56
Recency 5 May 2015 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 58 Watt

The Radeon R9 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 370
Radeon R9 370
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 377 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 701 vote

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.