Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs R9 370 1024SP
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 436 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.49 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Trinidad | Vega 12 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 June 2015 (10 years ago) | 14 November 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 815 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | 1283 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,800 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 62.40 | 102.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.997 TFLOPS | 3.284 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 740 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 189.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 June 2015 | 14 November 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Pro Vega 20 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 370 1024SP and Radeon Pro Vega 20. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 370 1024SP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
