Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs R9 370 1024SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.81
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTrinidadVega 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date12 June 2015 (10 years ago)14 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speed925 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate62.4076.16
Floating-point processing power1.997 TFLOPS2.437 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s307.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 June 2015 14 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

Pro Vega 16 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 370 1024SP and Radeon Pro Vega 16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 370 1024SP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 302 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 370 1024SP or Radeon Pro Vega 16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.