Radeon RX 6650 XT vs R9 295X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 295X2 and Radeon RX 6650 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 295X2
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 500 Watt
22.31

RX 6650 XT outperforms R9 295X2 by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking23168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.3130.44
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameVesuviusNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $399
Current price$600 (0.4x MSRP)$465 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6650 XT has 820% better value for money than R9 295X2.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28162048
Core clock speedno data2055 MHz
Boost clock speed1018 MHz2635 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate179.2337.3
Floating-point performance2x 5,733 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length307 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz17500 MHz
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s280.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 295X2 22.31
RX 6650 XT 44.75
+101%

RX 6650 XT outperforms R9 295X2 by 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 295X2 8617
RX 6650 XT 17281
+101%

RX 6650 XT outperforms R9 295X2 by 101% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 295X2 21197
RX 6650 XT 29796
+40.6%

RX 6650 XT outperforms R9 295X2 by 41% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
−108%
135
+108%
1440p30−35
−123%
67
+123%
4K18−20
−106%
37
+106%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−113%
128
+113%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−120%
75−80
+120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−120%
75−80
+120%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−104%
140−150
+104%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−116%
108
+116%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−109%
90−95
+109%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−118%
100−110
+118%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−103%
160−170
+103%
Hitman 3 45−50
−102%
90−95
+102%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−104%
327
+104%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−102%
120−130
+102%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−106%
100−110
+106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−110%
273
+110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−105%
133
+105%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−120%
75−80
+120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−120%
75−80
+120%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−104%
140−150
+104%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−120%
88
+120%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−109%
90−95
+109%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−118%
100−110
+118%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−103%
160−170
+103%
Hitman 3 45−50
−102%
90−95
+102%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−103%
180−190
+103%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−109%
73
+109%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−106%
100−110
+106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−102%
222
+102%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
−102%
182
+102%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−110%
100−110
+110%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−120%
75−80
+120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−120%
75−80
+120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−123%
78
+123%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−109%
90−95
+109%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−103%
160−170
+103%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−104%
173
+104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
−103%
193
+103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−114%
107
+114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−117%
65
+117%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−106%
100−110
+106%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−120%
85−90
+120%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−110%
100−110
+110%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−104%
45−50
+104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−113%
50−55
+113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−110%
44
+110%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−107%
114
+107%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−113%
95−100
+113%
Hitman 3 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−115%
129
+115%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−107%
114
+107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−107%
124
+107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−127%
65−70
+127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−104%
49
+104%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−120%
75−80
+120%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−119%
45−50
+119%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−117%
35−40
+117%
Hitman 3 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−119%
55−60
+119%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−133%
42
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−107%
56
+107%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−129%
30−35
+129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−125%
18
+125%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−110%
60−65
+110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−106%
72
+106%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−122%
60
+122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−130%
23
+130%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−128%
40−45
+128%

This is how R9 295X2 and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 108% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 123% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 106% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.31 44.75
Recency 29 April 2014 10 May 2022
Cost $1499 $399
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 176 Watt

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 295X2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 92 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2885 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.