Radeon HD 7970 vs R9 295X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 295X2 and Radeon HD 7970, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 295X2
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 500 Watt
22.31
+64.2%

R9 295X2 outperforms HD 7970 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking231355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.304.00
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameVesuviusTahiti XT
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferencereference
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)22 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $549
Current price$600 (0.4x MSRP)$89 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 7970 has 21% better value for money than R9 295X2.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28162048
Boost clock speed1018 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate179.2118.4
Floating-point performance2x 5,733 gflops3,789 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16PCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length307 mm274 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s264 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity1+
HDMI++
DisplayPort support--

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration--
CrossFire11
Enduro--
FreeSync11
HD3D+-
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune--
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio--
ZeroCore--
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 11
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+no data
Mantle--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 295X2 22.31
+64.2%
HD 7970 13.59

R9 295X2 outperforms HD 7970 by 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 295X2 8617
+64.2%
HD 7970 5248

R9 295X2 outperforms HD 7970 by 64% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 295X2 21197
+209%
HD 7970 6862

R9 295X2 outperforms HD 7970 by 209% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p170−180
+61.9%
105
−61.9%
Full HD160−170
+55.3%
103
−55.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Hitman 3 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

This is how R9 295X2 and HD 7970 compete in popular games:

  • R9 295X2 is 62% faster in 900p
  • R9 295X2 is 55% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.31 13.59
Recency 29 April 2014 22 December 2011
Cost $1499 $549
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 300 Watt

The Radeon R9 295X2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7970 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
AMD Radeon HD 7970
Radeon HD 7970

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 92 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 292 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.