HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R9 295X2

Place in performance ranking	231	717
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	3.22	0.09
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code name	Vesuvius	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	29 April 2014 (10 years ago)	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,499	no data
Current price	$600 (0.4x MSRP)	$370

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 295X2 has 3478% better value for money than HD Graphics 630.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2816	24
Core clock speed	no data	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1018 MHz	1150 MHz
Number of transistors	6,200 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	500 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	179.2	26.40
Floating-point performance	2x 5,733 gflops	441.6 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	307 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	2 x 8-pin	no data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	64 GB
Memory bus width	512 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	640 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data
HDMI	+	no data
DisplayPort support	-	no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
CrossFire	1	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
LiquidVR	1	no data
PowerTune	-	no data
TressFX	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	-	no data
UVD	+	no data
DDMA audio	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	+	+
Mantle	-	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 295X2 22.27
+621%

HD Graphics 630 3.09

Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms HD Graphics 630 by 621% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 295X2 8621
+620%

HD Graphics 630 1197

Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms HD Graphics 630 by 620% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 295X2 21197
+1887%

HD Graphics 630 1067

Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms HD Graphics 630 by 1887% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 +567%	15 −567%
1440p	450−500 +603%	64 −603%
4K	90−95 +592%	13 −592%

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	22.27	3.09
Recency	29 April 2014	1 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	64 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	500 Watt	15 Watt