GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 295X2

Place in performance ranking	231	304
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.30	10.55
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Vesuvius	N18P-G62 Max-Q
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	29 April 2014 (10 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,499	no data
Current price	$600 (0.4x MSRP)	$1183

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has 220% better value for money than R9 295X2.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2816	1024
Core clock speed	no data	1035 MHz
Boost clock speed	1018 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	6,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	500 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	179.2	76.80
Floating-point performance	2x 5,733 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 295X2 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	307 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2 x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	512 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	640 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data
HDMI	+	no data
DisplayPort support	-	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
CrossFire	1	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
LiquidVR	1	no data
PowerTune	-	no data
TressFX	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	-	no data
UVD	+	no data
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.140
Mantle	-	no data
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 295X2 22.31
+34.3%

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.61

Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 295X2 8617
+34.3%

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6414

Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 34% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 295X2 21197
+148%

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 8564

Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 148% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	70−75 +29.6%	54 −29.6%
1440p	35−40 +25%	28 −25%
4K	30−35 +30.4%	23 −30.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27
+44.4%

18−20

−44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	49 +40%	35−40 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45 +50%	30−33 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Hitman 3	45 +50%	30−33 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	107 +42.7%	75−80 −42.7%
Metro Exodus	86 +43.3%	60−65 −43.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	63 +40%	45−50 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	77 +40%	55−60 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	49 +40%	35−40 −40%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24 +50%	16−18 −50%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	34 +41.7%	24−27 −41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Hitman 3	36 +50%	24−27 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +46.7%	45−50 −46.7%
Metro Exodus	58 +45%	40−45 −45%
Red Dead Redemption 2	53 +51.4%	35−40 −51.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	62 +37.8%	45−50 −37.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +35%	40−45 −35%
Watch Dogs: Legion	193 +37.9%	140−150 −37.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	19 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 +50%	8−9 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	22 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	57 +42.5%	40−45 −42.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	54 +35%	40−45 −35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16 +60%	10−11 −60%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

46
+53.3%

30−33

−53.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 +50%	8−9 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Far Cry 5	33 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Hitman 3	25 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14 +40%	10−11 −40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+50%

18−20

−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Hitman 3	14 +40%	10−11 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	15 +50%	10−11 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	22 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+50%

10−11

−50%

This is how R9 295X2 and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

R9 295X2 is 30% faster in 1080p
R9 295X2 is 25% faster in 1440p
R9 295X2 is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	22.31	16.61
Recency	29 April 2014	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	500 Watt	35 Watt