GeForce 8200M G mGPU vs Radeon R9 290X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameHawaiiC79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 June 2014 (11 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816 ×216
Core clock speed1000 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate176.0 ×23.200
Floating-point processing power5.632 TFLOPS ×20.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×24
TMUs176 ×28
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 June 2014 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 12 Watt

R9 290X2 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

8200M G mGPU, on the other hand, has 4733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 290X2 and GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Radeon R9 290X2
NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 290X2 or GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.