Radeon R9 290X2 vs GeForce 9400M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1473not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.01no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameC79Hawaii
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)24 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162816 ×2
Core clock speed450 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors314 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt580 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600176.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS5.632 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs464 ×2
TMUs8176 ×2
L1 Cacheno data704 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data4x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data345.6 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 24 June 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 580 Watt

9400M G has 4733.3% lower power consumption.

R9 290X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M G and Radeon R9 290X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 290X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G
GeForce 9400M G
AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Radeon R9 290X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M G or Radeon R9 290X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.