ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs R9 290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3431601
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.31no data
Power efficiency4.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameHawaiiRV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 October 2013 (12 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speedno data200 MHz
Boost clock speed947 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate176.00.8
Floating-point processing power5.632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1764
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 128.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 290X 7425
+371150%
Samples: 481
ATI 9200 SE 2
Samples: 78

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD86no data
4K50no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.38no data
4K10.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80 no data
Counter-Strike 2 100−110 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Fortnite 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 5 55−60 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80 no data
Counter-Strike 2 100−110 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Dota 2 100−110 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Fortnite 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 5 55−60 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 67 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Dota 2 136 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 no data
Valorant 170−180 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 52 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Dota 2 84 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 October 2013 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

R9 290X has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE, on the other hand, has 793% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 290X and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 529 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 71 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 290X or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.