ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs R9 280X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 7870 XT HD 7950 HD 7950 Mac Edition HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 HD 7970 HD 7970 GHz Edition HD 8950 OEM HD 8970 OEM R9 280 R9 280X R9 280X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
All-In-Wonder 9200 All-In-Wonder 9200 LE All-In-Wonder 9200 SE FireMV 2200 PCI 9200 9200 LE 9200 PCI 9200 PRO 9200 SE 9200 SE PCI 9250 9250 PCI

Contents

Share:
R9 280X R9 280X
ATI 9200 SE 9200 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4071601
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.88no data
Power efficiency4.30no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTahitiRV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (12 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data200 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate128.00.8
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1284
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidth288 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 128.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 280X 5837
+291750%
Samples: 5484
ATI 9200 SE 2
Samples: 78

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65no data
4K31no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.60no data
4K9.65no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 30−33 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Fortnite 158 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Dota 2 90−95 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Fortnite 60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 54 no data
Metro Exodus 30−33 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Dota 2 137 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 48 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 30−35 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Valorant 75−80 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 68 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 8 October 2013 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

R9 280X has an age advantage of 10 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE, on the other hand, has 793% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280X and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
ATI 9200 SE Radeon 9200 SE
vs
R9 370X Radeon R9 370X
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
Plex 7000 Quadro Plex 7000
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
HD Graphics HD Graphics
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
HD 6850 Radeon HD 6850
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
8500 GT GeForce 8500 GT
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
7300 GT GeForce 7300 GT
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
Riva TNT2 M64 Riva TNT2 M64

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 760 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 71 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 280X or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.