HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) vs Radeon R9 290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 290X with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), including specs and performance data.

R9 290X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
17.72
+5270%

R9 290X outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by a whopping 5270% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3311338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.25no data
Power efficiency4.65no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)
GPU code nameHawaiiSandy Bridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 October 2013 (11 years ago)1 May 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28166
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed947 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate176.0no data
Floating-point processing power5.632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs176no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width512 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth320 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1210.1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 290X 17.72
+5270%
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 0.33

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R9 290X 37284
+3720%
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 976

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 290X 73987
+5168%
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 1405

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD86
+1129%
7
−1129%
4K500−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.38no data
4K10.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+10100%
1−2
−10100%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
God of War 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+10100%
1−2
−10100%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Fortnite 95−100
+9600%
1−2
−9600%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
God of War 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+871%
7−8
−871%
Valorant 130−140
+456%
24−27
−456%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+10100%
1−2
−10100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280
+2700%
10
−2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Dota 2 100−110
+950%
10−11
−950%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Fortnite 95−100
+9600%
1−2
−9600%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
God of War 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+6600%
1−2
−6600%
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+871%
7−8
−871%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
Valorant 130−140
+456%
24−27
−456%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Dota 2 136
+1260%
10−11
−1260%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
God of War 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
+529%
7−8
−529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+480%
5−6
−480%
Valorant 130−140
+456%
24−27
−456%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+9600%
1−2
−9600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+6500%
2−3
−6500%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+4075%
4−5
−4075%
Valorant 170−180
+5633%
3−4
−5633%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
God of War 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 52
+247%
14−16
−247%
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 0−1
Valorant 100−110
+5000%
2−3
−5000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Dota 2 84
+8300%
1−2
−8300%
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
God of War 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%

This is how R9 290X and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) compete in popular games:

  • R9 290X is 1129% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R9 290X is 5000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 290X surpassed HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.72 0.33
Recency 24 October 2013 1 May 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

R9 290X has a 5269.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 290X is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X is a desktop graphics card while HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 503 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 95 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 290X or HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.