Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 280X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking405not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.81no data
Power efficiency4.27no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTahitiGK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (12 years ago)7 August 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $2,249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Core clock speedno data706 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz706 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate128.090.37
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS2.169 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs128128
L1 Cache512 KB128 KB
L2 Cache768 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length275 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth288 GB/s172.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 7 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 122 Watt

R9 280X has an age advantage of 1 year.

K5000 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 104.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280X and Quadro K5000 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280X is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K5000 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 752 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro K5000 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 280X or Quadro K5000 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.