GeForce2 Go 200 vs Radeon R9 280X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking388not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.73no data
Power efficiency4.21no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameTahitiNV11 B2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)6 February 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data143 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate128.00.57
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB32 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidth288 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 127.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 6 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 2 Watt

R9 280X has an age advantage of 12 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go 200, on the other hand, has 12400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280X and GeForce2 Go 200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280X is a desktop graphics card while GeForce2 Go 200 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X
NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 200
GeForce2 Go 200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 736 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce2 Go 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 280X or GeForce2 Go 200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.