CMP 170HX 8 GB vs Radeon R9 280X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking403not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.88no data
Power efficiency4.29no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTahitiGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (12 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $4,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484480
Core clock speedno data1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0394.8
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs128280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cache512 KB13.1 MB
L2 Cache768 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth288 GB/s1.49 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

CMP 170HX 8 GB has an age advantage of 7 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280X and CMP 170HX 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280X is a desktop graphics card while CMP 170HX 8 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB
CMP 170HX 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 752 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 108 votes

Rate CMP 170HX 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 280X or CMP 170HX 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.