GeForce G110M vs Radeon R9 280

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking415not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.68no data
Power efficiency5.08no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTahitiG96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date4 March 2014 (11 years ago)8 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179216
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed933 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate104.53.200
Floating-point processing power3.344 TFLOPS0.032 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs324
TMUs1128
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth240 GB/s8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortDisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data
Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 March 2014 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 14 Watt

R9 280 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G110M, on the other hand, has 1328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280 and GeForce G110M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce G110M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280
Radeon R9 280
NVIDIA GeForce G110M
GeForce G110M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 439 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce G110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 280 or GeForce G110M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.