GeForce GT 440 vs Radeon R9 270X

Place in the ranking	394	897
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.83	0.08
Power efficiency	4.83	2.10
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Curacao	GF108
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)	1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 270X has 7188% better value for money than GT 440.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	96
Core clock speed	no data	810 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,800 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	98 °C
Texture fill rate	84.00	12.96
Floating-point processing power	2.688 TFLOPS	0.311 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	80	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2 x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Standard memory config per GPU	no data	1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5)
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	HDMIVGADual Link DVI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
DisplayPort support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
LiquidVR	+	-
TressFX	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
UVD	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270X 12.65
+536%

GT 440 1.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 270X 4871
+535%

GT 440 767

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 270X 6560
+672%

GT 440 850

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

20−22

+567%

3−4
−567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +625%	4−5 −625%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +567%	6−7 −567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +625%	4−5 −625%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +592%	12−14 −592%
Hitman 3	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +560%	10−11 −560%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +600%	6−7 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +583%	6−7 −583%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +610%	10−11 −610%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +625%	4−5 −625%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +567%	6−7 −567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +625%	4−5 −625%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +592%	12−14 −592%
Hitman 3	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +560%	10−11 −560%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +600%	6−7 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +583%	6−7 −583%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +675%	4−5 −675%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +610%	10−11 −610%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +625%	4−5 −625%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +625%	4−5 −625%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +592%	12−14 −592%
Hitman 3	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +560%	10−11 −560%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +583%	6−7 −583%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +675%	4−5 −675%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +610%	10−11 −610%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

+600%

5−6
−600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +850%	2−3 −850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Far Cry 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +589%	9−10 −589%
Hitman 3	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +550%	4−5 −550%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +558%	12−14 −558%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+600%

3−4
−600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Hitman 3	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +567%	9−10 −567%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+1100%

1−2

−1100%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.65	1.99
Recency	8 October 2013	1 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	65 Watt