Quadro M1200 vs Radeon R9 270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

R9 270
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.15
+33.4%

Radeon R9 270 outperforms Quadro M1200 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking391471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.110.89
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameCuracaoN17P-Q1
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 November 2013 (10 years ago)13 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data
Current price$229 (1.3x MSRP)$1372

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 270 has 137% better value for money than Quadro M1200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280640
Core clock speedno data991 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate74.0043.72
Floating-point performance2,368 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 270 and Quadro M1200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data
Optimusno data+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270 11.15
+33.4%
Quadro M1200 8.36

Radeon R9 270 outperforms Quadro M1200 by 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 270 4306
+33.4%
Quadro M1200 3228

Radeon R9 270 outperforms Quadro M1200 by 33% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 270 5930
+43.2%
Quadro M1200 4142

Radeon R9 270 outperforms Quadro M1200 by 43% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+20.7%
29
−20.7%
4K16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Hitman 3 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Hitman 3 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hitman 3 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

This is how R9 270 and Quadro M1200 compete in popular games:

  • R9 270 is 21% faster in 1080p
  • R9 270 is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.15 8.36
Recency 13 November 2013 13 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 45 Watt

The Radeon R9 270 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 270 is a desktop card while Quadro M1200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270
Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 565 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 288 votes

Rate Quadro M1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.