GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs Radeon R9 270

Place in performance ranking	391	35
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.10	43.71
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Curacao	Turing TU102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	13 November 2013 (10 years ago)	27 August 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	$999
Current price	$229 (1.3x MSRP)	$297 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2080 Ti has 1981% better value for money than R9 270.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	4352
Core clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	925 MHz	1545 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	270 Watt
Texture fill rate	74.00	420.2
Floating-point performance	2,368 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	210 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	11 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	352 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	616.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Eyefinity	1	no data
HDMI	+	+
DisplayPort support	+	no data
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
CrossFire	1	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
LiquidVR	1	no data
PowerTune	-	no data
TressFX	1	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
ZeroCore	-	no data
UVD	+	no data
DDMA audio	+	no data
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
Mantle	-	no data
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270 11.14

RTX 2080 Ti 56.35
+406%

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 270 by 406% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 270 4306

RTX 2080 Ti 21784
+406%

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 270 by 406% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 270 5930

RTX 2080 Ti 20210
+241%

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 270 by 241% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 −447%	164 +447%
1440p	21−24 −462%	118 +462%
4K	18−20 −428%	95 +428%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.14	56.35
Recency	13 November 2013	27 August 2018
Cost	$179	$999
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	11 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	270 Watt