ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs R9 255 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated993
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.05
Power efficiencyno data0.56
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameCape VerdeR600
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 December 2013 (11 years ago)14 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512320
Core clock speed900 MHz743 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt215 Watt
Texture fill rate29.7611.89
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS0.4755 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3216
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz828 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s106.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 215 Watt

R9 255 OEM has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 230.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and Radeon HD 2900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Radeon R9 255 OEM
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1068 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 70 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 255 OEM or Radeon HD 2900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.