Radeon R7 350 640SP vs ATI HD 2900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking993not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency0.56no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameR600Cape Verde
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)7 January 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320640
Core clock speed743 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors720 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate11.8937.00
Floating-point processing power0.4755 TFLOPS1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1640
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed828 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth106.0 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 55 Watt

R7 350 640SP has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 290.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 XT and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
Radeon R7 350 640SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 70 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2900 XT or Radeon R7 350 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.