GeForce2 Go vs Radeon R9 255 OEM
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1580 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.39 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Celsius (1999−2005) |
| GPU code name | Cape Verde | NV11 B2 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 21 December 2013 (11 years ago) | 11 November 2000 (24 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 143 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 930 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,500 million | 20 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 29.76 | 0.57 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.9523 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 4 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 166 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s | 5.312 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 7.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.2 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 December 2013 | 11 November 2000 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2 Watt |
R9 255 OEM has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
GeForce2 Go, on the other hand, has 3150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and GeForce2 Go. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop graphics card while GeForce2 Go is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
