GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 255 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGM107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 December 2013 (11 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512640
Core clock speed900 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate29.7644.96
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS1.439 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3240
L1 Cache128 KB320 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 13 March 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

R9 255 OEM has 15.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 950M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Radeon R9 255 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1068 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 255 OEM or GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.