RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Radeon R8 M445DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R8 M445DX with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

R8 M445DX
2016
1.80

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms R8 M445DX by a whopping 3672% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93220
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data78.13
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameMesoGB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3208960
Core clock speed780 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rate20.42374.4
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs20280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cache80 KB8.8 MB
L2 Cache128 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R8 M445DX 1.80
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 67.89
+3672%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R8 M445DX 796
Samples: 30
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 30019
+3671%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−3471%
500−550
+3471%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3614%
260−270
+3614%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Fortnite 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−3400%
350−400
+3400%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3614%
260−270
+3614%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
Valorant 35−40
−3618%
1450−1500
+3618%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50
−3600%
1850−1900
+3600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Dota 2 23
−3596%
850−900
+3596%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Fortnite 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−3400%
350−400
+3400%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−3567%
220−230
+3567%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3614%
260−270
+3614%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−3614%
260−270
+3614%
Valorant 35−40
−3618%
1450−1500
+3618%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Dota 2 21
−3471%
750−800
+3471%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−3400%
350−400
+3400%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3614%
260−270
+3614%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Valorant 35−40
−3618%
1450−1500
+3618%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−3362%
450−500
+3362%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−3511%
650−700
+3511%
Valorant 14−16
−3471%
500−550
+3471%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−3567%
550−600
+3567%
Valorant 10−11
−3400%
350−400
+3400%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

This is how R8 M445DX and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 3471% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 67.89
Recency 15 May 2016 11 August 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has a 3671.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R8 M445DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R8 M445DX is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon R8 M445DX
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 86 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M445DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R8 M445DX or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.