GeForce GT 740 vs Radeon R8 M445DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R8 M445DX with GeForce GT 740, including specs and performance data.

R8 M445DX
2016
2.07

GT 740 outperforms R8 M445DX by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking879705
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.19
Power efficiencyno data4.11
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameMesoGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)29 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed780 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data64 Watt
Texture fill rate20.4231.78
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPS0.7626 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.19 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.05.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R8 M445DX 2.07
GT 740 3.84
+85.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R8 M445DX 796
GT 740 1478
+85.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R8 M445DX 2209
+13.3%
GT 740 1950

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.71

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

This is how R8 M445DX and GT 740 compete in popular games:

  • GT 740 is 71% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 3.84
Recency 15 May 2016 29 May 2014

R8 M445DX has an age advantage of 1 year.

GT 740, on the other hand, has a 85.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GT 740 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R8 M445DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R8 M445DX is a notebook card while GeForce GT 740 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon R8 M445DX
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GeForce GT 740

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 86 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M445DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1175 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.