Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 vs Radeon R8 M365DX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1006not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Gen. 3 (2005)
GPU code nameMesoGMA 950
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2015 (10 years ago)1 March 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844
Core clock speed900 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1125 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data7 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)no data
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2015 1 March 2005
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

R8 M365DX has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R8 M365DX and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
Radeon R8 M365DX
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 9 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M365DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 83 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R8 M365DX or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.