NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

R8 M365DX
1.55

GeForce 920M outperforms Radeon R8 M365DX by 21% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking922867
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data0.04
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameMesoN16V-GM-S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2015 (8 years old)27 January 2015 (9 years old)
Current priceno data$895
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed720 / 1125 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data33 Watt
Texture fill rate27.0030.53
Floating-point performanceno data297.6 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R8 M365DX and GeForce 920M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus width128 + 64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 / 1000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimusno data+
GameWorksno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.05.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R8 M365DX 1.55
GeForce 920M 1.87
+20.6%

GeForce 920M outperforms Radeon R8 M365DX by 21% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R8 M365DX 601
GeForce 920M 723
+20.3%

GeForce 920M outperforms Radeon R8 M365DX by 20% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R8 M365DX 6992
+25.1%
GeForce 920M 5587

Radeon R8 M365DX outperforms GeForce 920M by 25% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R8 M365DX 2863
+66.6%
GeForce 920M 1719

Radeon R8 M365DX outperforms GeForce 920M by 67% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R8 M365DX 1902
+63.8%
GeForce 920M 1162

Radeon R8 M365DX outperforms GeForce 920M by 64% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R8 M365DX 11291
+55.9%
GeForce 920M 7242

Radeon R8 M365DX outperforms GeForce 920M by 56% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

R8 M365DX 67636
GeForce 920M 90619
+34%

GeForce 920M outperforms Radeon R8 M365DX by 34% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−14.3%
16
+14.3%
4K7−8
−28.6%
9
+28.6%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
Hitman 3 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−650%
15
+650%
Hitman 3 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+0%
7
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how R8 M365DX and GeForce 920M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GeForce 920M is 14.3% faster than R8 M365DX

4K resolution:

  • GeForce 920M is 28.6% faster than R8 M365DX

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 920M is 700% faster than the R8 M365DX.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 920M is ahead in 12 tests (34%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (66%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.55 1.87
Recency 3 June 2015 27 January 2015
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 4 GB

The GeForce 920M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R8 M365DX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
Radeon R8 M365DX
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 8 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R8 M365DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1117 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.