GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R8 M365DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M315 R7 A360 R7 M340 R7 M350 R7 M360 R7 M440 R7 M445 R7 M460 R8 M365DX R8 M445DX R8 M535DX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
610 610 OEM 610 PCI 610 PCIe x1 620 620 OEM 625 OEM 630 630 OEM 630 Rev. 2 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 635 OEM 640 640 OEM 640 OEM Rebrand 640 Rev. 2 645 OEM

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R8 M365DX with GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.

R8 M365DX
2015
1.55

640 Rev. 2 outperforms R8 M365DX by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R8 M365DX R8 M365DX
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1009793
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.19
Power efficiencyno data5.17
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameMesoGK208
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2015 (10 years ago)29 May 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed900 MHz1046 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data49 Watt
Texture fill rate27.0033.47
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS0.8033 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2432
L1 Cache96 KB32 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1252 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data40.06 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.05.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.30

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Fortnite 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Valorant 35−40
−108%
75−80
+108%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 44
−105%
90−95
+105%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Dota 2 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Fortnite 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−100%
14−16
+100%
Valorant 35−40
−108%
75−80
+108%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Dota 2 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Valorant 35−40
−108%
75−80
+108%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Valorant 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Valorant 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

This is how R8 M365DX and GT 640 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:

  • GT 640 Rev. 2 is 93% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.55 3.29
Recency 3 June 2015 29 May 2013

R8 M365DX has an age advantage of 2 years.

GT 640 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 112% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R8 M365DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R8 M365DX is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R8 M365DX Radeon R8 M365DX
vs
R5 M430 Radeon R5 M430
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450
R8 M365DX Radeon R8 M365DX
vs
HD 6740G2 Radeon HD 6740G2
R7 (Kaveri) AMD R7 (Kaveri)
vs
A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB
R7 (Kaveri) AMD R7 (Kaveri)
vs
RTX 4090 Mobile 4090 Mobile
R8 M365DX AMD R8 M365DX
vs
GT 520M 520M
R8 M365DX AMD R8 M365DX
vs
ATI Mobility X1350 X1350
R8 M365DX AMD R8 M365DX
vs
GT 630 Rev. 2 630 Rev. 2
R8 M365DX AMD R8 M365DX
vs
GT 620 620
R8 M365DX AMD R8 M365DX
vs
Tesla K10 K10
R8 M365DX AMD R8 M365DX
vs
ATI HD 5550 5550
R8 M365DX AMD R8 M365DX
vs
8800 GTS 112 8800 GTS Core 112
R8 M365DX AMD R8 M365DX
vs
ATI Mobility X1600 Mac Edition X1600 Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 9 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M365DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 36 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R8 M365DX or GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.