Radeon RX 7900 XT vs R8 M350DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated20
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.72
Power efficiencyno data17.55
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameJetNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 December 2015 (9 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845376
Core clock speed955 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz2394 MHz
Number of transistors690 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate24.72804.4
Floating-point processing power0.791 TFLOPS51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs24336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data800.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2015 3 November 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RX 7900 XT has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R8 M350DX and Radeon RX 7900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R8 M350DX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M350DX
Radeon R8 M350DX
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M350DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2339 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R8 M350DX or Radeon RX 7900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.