Arc A530M vs FirePro A320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.79
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTrinity GLDG2-256
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)1 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841536
Core clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed955 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate22.92124.8
Floating-point processing power0.7334 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2496
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 1 August 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt

Arc A530M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 433% more advanced lithography process, and 54% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro A320 and Arc A530M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro A320 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A530M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate FirePro A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 225 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro A320 or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.