UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) vs Radeon R7 M465X

Radeon R7 M380 Radeon R7 M465X Radeon R9 M360 Radeon R9 M365X Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M375 Radeon R9 M375X
VS
UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile UHD Graphics 24EU UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 32EU UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 48EU UHD Graphics 64EU UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M465X and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M465X
2016
2 GB GDDR5
4.62
+98.3%

R7 M465X outperforms UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

R7 M465X R7 M465X
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking659859
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTropoAlder Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51224
Core clock speed900 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Texture fill rate29.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.9472 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1125 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
+75%
8
−75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 7
+0%
7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4
+0%
4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6
+0%
6
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
+0%
5
+0%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6
+0%
6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+0%
4
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how R7 M465X and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compete in popular games:

  • R7 M465X is 75% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.62 2.33
Recency 15 May 2016 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

R7 M465X has a 98.3% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 M465X is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 M465X
Radeon R7 M465X
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M465X Radeon R7 M465X
vs
R9 M375X Radeon R9 M375X
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
vs
Iris Graphics 6100 Iris Graphics 6100
R7 M465X Radeon R7 M465X
vs
GTX 670M GeForce GTX 670M
605 OEM GeForce 605 OEM
vs
Vega 7 7
GT 520 NVIDIA GT 520
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GT 440 NVIDIA GT 440
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mac Edition Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition
GTX 560 Ti X2 NVIDIA GTX 560 Ti X2
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Graphics 770
E9260 PCIe AMD E9260 PCIe
vs
Pro W6600 W6600
R7 M350 AMD R7 M350
vs
RX Vega 2 Vega 2
R9 M360 AMD R9 M360
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2 Radeon HD 3870 X2
R9 M360 AMD R9 M360
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3850 X2 Radeon HD 3850 X2
R9 M360 AMD R9 M360
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3450 Radeon HD 3450
R9 M375X AMD R9 M375X
vs
GTX 745 OEM 745 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 82 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M465X or UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.