GeForce MX570 vs Radeon R7 M465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A

Aggregate performance score

R7 M465
2017
2 GB GDDR5
2.83

GeForce MX570 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by a whopping 426% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking755332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameLitho XTGN20-S5
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed825 MHzno data
Boost clock speed960 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15-45 Watt
Texture fill rate27.0073.92
Floating-point performance864.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M465 and GeForce MX570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M465 2.83
GeForce MX570 14.88
+426%

GeForce MX570 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by 426% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 M465 1095
GeForce MX570 5749
+425%

GeForce MX570 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by 425% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−860%
45−50
+860%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Hitman 3 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−200%
45−50
+200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−860%
45−50
+860%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Hitman 3 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−200%
45−50
+200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−200%
45−50
+200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−480%
27−30
+480%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Hitman 3 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 20−22
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 6−7

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce MX570 surpassed R7 M465 in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.83 14.88
Recency 1 January 2017 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M465 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M465
Radeon R7 M465
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 17 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 70 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.