Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R7 M460

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M460 with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

R7 M460
2016
2 GB DDR3
2.65

Iris Plus Graphics outperforms R7 M460 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking816657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.54
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameMesoIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed1100 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1125 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate27.0032.00
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M460 2.65
Iris Plus Graphics 4.60
+73.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M460 1044
Iris Plus Graphics 1812
+73.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Fortnite 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Valorant 40−45
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Fortnite 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
−60%
8−9
+60%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 40−45
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Valorant 40−45
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Valorant 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Valorant 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

This is how R7 M460 and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics is 62% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.65 4.60
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics has a 73.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Plus Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M460 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M460 is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M460
Radeon R7 M460
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 48 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 381 vote

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M460 or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.