Quadro K1100M vs Radeon R7 M445

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

R7 M445
2016
4 GB GDDR5
2.44

Quadro K1100M outperforms Radeon R7 M445 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking799756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.100.21
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameMesoGK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 May 2016 (7 years ago)23 July 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$109.94
Current price$809 $350 (3.2x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

K1100M has 110% better value for money than R7 M445.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed920 MHz705 MHz
Boost clock speed920 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-25 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate18.4022.59
Floating-point performance588.8 gflops542.2 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M445 and Quadro K1100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-A (3.0)

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s44.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.05
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M445 2.44
K1100M 2.81
+15.2%

Quadro K1100M outperforms Radeon R7 M445 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 M445 943
K1100M 1086
+15.2%

Quadro K1100M outperforms Radeon R7 M445 by 15% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 M445 6872
K1100M 8992
+30.8%

Quadro K1100M outperforms Radeon R7 M445 by 31% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 M445 2208
+20.9%
K1100M 1827

Radeon R7 M445 outperforms Quadro K1100M by 21% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 M445 1579
+17.8%
K1100M 1341

Radeon R7 M445 outperforms Quadro K1100M by 18% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 M445 9617
+4.2%
K1100M 9228

Radeon R7 M445 outperforms Quadro K1100M by 4% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−28.6%
18
+28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Hitman 3 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Hitman 3 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+42.9%
7
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+25%
4
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how R7 M445 and K1100M compete in popular games:

  • K1100M is 28.6% faster than R7 M445 in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M445 is 42.9% faster than the K1100M.
  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the K1100M is 100% faster than the R7 M445.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 M445 is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • K1100M is ahead in 28 tests (57%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (39%)

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 2.44 2.81
Recency 15 May 2016 23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

The Quadro K1100M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M445 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M445 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K1100M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M445
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Quadro K1100M

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 118 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 179 votes

Rate Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.