Radeon X1950 XTX vs R7 M440
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 807 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.10 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | R500 (2005−2007) |
| GPU code name | Meso | R580+ |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (7 years ago) | 17 October 2006 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $449 |
| Current price | $737 | $47 (0.1x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1021 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 384 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | unknown | 125 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 17.82 | 10.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 653.4 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon R7 M440 and Radeon X1950 XTX compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 230 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 17 October 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M440 and Radeon X1950 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R7 M440 is a notebook card while Radeon X1950 XTX is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
